WebbAxum, closely followed by Actix-Web (both are good choices - Axum is smaller and simpler, Actix-Web arguably has better documentation). Rocket is well designed and engineered but suffers from inconsistent maintenance (long periods with no updates). Webb25 maj 2024 · Warp is a bit verbose in my experience. The initial idea behind warp is pretty cool, very flexible http library, but in practice it is not very helpful. I would personally use …
Which Web Framework do people recommend for Rust in 2024?
Webbwarp - A super-easy, composable, web server framework for warp speeds. rust-websocket - A WebSocket (RFC6455) library written in Rust hyper - An HTTP library for Rust Nickel - An expressjs inspired web framework for Rust rust-web-framework-comparison - A comparison of some web frameworks and libs written in Rust WebbThe main concept in warp is the Filter, which allows composition to describe various endpoints in your web service. Besides this powerful trait, warp comes with several built … fd3 box
axum - Rust
WebbRust is indeed more suitable for backend services. It's the efficient to write be in time of development or in runtime. Unlike some people choosing rust for its top performance, I choose rust its sophisticated type system. Rust has great type system it's easy to model your business logic/backend services. Webbwarp - A super-easy, composable, web server framework for warp speeds. hyper - An HTTP library for Rust tonic - A native gRPC client & server implementation with async/await support. tokio - A runtime for writing reliable asynchronous applications with Rust. Provides I/O, networking, scheduling, timers, ... WebbBoth frameworks will likely be faster than you will ever need, rocket is probably my favourite because 5he api is nicer to use than warp. But will warp supports ws which is a thing to consider. Both frameworks are built on the same runtimes and servers (hyper.rs and tokio) 24 ben0x539 • 2 yr. ago likely be faster than you will ever need, fd3a formations